Posted: August 19th, 2016 | Author: Ian | Filed under: Academy, Technology, writing | Tags: citation, MLA | No Comments »
(tl;dr: MLA 8 makes some major changes, but they’re great and you should love them.)
When style guides were created writers used print sources almost exclusively. As types of sources have increased, so has the complexity of style guides. The 7th edition of MLA Guide for Writers of Research Papers weighed in at nearly 300 pages and was—frankly—woefully inadequate for citing 21st century media.
Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Associate Executive Director and Director of Scholarly Communication for MLA, puts it another way:
Writers need to know how to cite an ebook, how to cite a tweet, how to cite an Instagram image, how to cite — no, seriously, my office actually received this inquiry — a book that a player reads within the action of a video game. At some point, the process of developing and disseminating all of these citation formats runs the risk of creating a map that is larger and more complex than the terrain through which it attempts to guide writers and readers. And this is the point at which academic writers understandably begin to grumble about citations being outdated and unnecessary anyhow.
MLA 8 is a slim, trim 160 pages and takes a rather bold new approach to citation.
Core Elements of MLA 8
Instead of following a rigid formula, writers are asked to consider the source and apply a source-neutral method the MLA calls its “core elements” (“What’s New”).
The idea is that writers will be able to format any citation—regardless of the media source—for years to come. This allows some flexibility for authors and greater success for readers (and graders!) following citations and tracking down sources.
🔑 One format for all sources–whether scholarly article or tweet.
🔑 URLs are back in. Where the 7th edition chopped the URL, MLA 8 asks for its inclusion.
🔑 No more city names for publishers.
🔑 You may cite an author’s pseudonym. This is especially important for social media sources.
WHY THIS IS EXCITING
This citation update requires more thinking from the writer. Rather than routinely following a prescribed formula in a book, students will be forced to wrestle with sources and—ideally—consider whether the “container” indicates that the source is reliable and scholarly.
MLA Style Center An excellent online resource for teachers and students alike
“MLA Eighth Edition: What’s New and Different” from Purdue OWL
“Plagiarism and Academic Dishonesty” by MLA
“What’s New in the Eighth Edition” by MLA
“Shifting into 8th (On MLA’s new edition)” by Joyce Valenza from School Library Journal
“The Future of Academic Style: Why Citations Still Matter in the Age of Google” by Kathleen Fitzpatrick in Los Angeles Review of Books
“MLA 7 vs. MLA 8” from EasyBib
Posted: February 19th, 2015 | Author: Ian | Filed under: Culture, Music | Tags: Enjoy Your Rabbit, Sufjan Stevens | No Comments »
It’s no secret that I love Sufjan Stevens. However, I have never been too sure about his second album, Enjoy Your Rabbit. It’s not at all like any of his early records and it hasn’t always been my favorite thing to listen to. The album is, frankly, noisy. It’s loud and brash and at time unsettling.
Still, it’s Sufjan so I’m a fan.
I was hesitant to dive into this album, but I was pleasantly surprised. As with all of his music, the best part of the album is his focus on a strong melodic presence. The first two tracks are pretty solid, but “Year of the Rat” has a strong hook that really sets the tone for the rest of the sounds.
While it will never be my favorite Sufjan record, it’s quite good and surprisingly adroit in a genre that isn’t necessarily his forte.
“Enjoy Your Rabbit” and “Year of the Snake”
Posted: February 3rd, 2015 | Author: Ian | Filed under: Music | Tags: Sufjan Stevens | No Comments »
I encountered Sufjan Stevens a little later that I wish were true. Sometime between the release of Seven Swans and Illinois a friend handed me a copy of a live Sufjan show and I was blown away. Most of the songs performed were from Michigan with a few from the recently released Seven Swans and the forthcoming Illinois. What I loved the most, though, were his awkward discussions between songs. The interludes were obviously rehearsed but they were halted and uncomfortable nonetheless. He had such command during the songs and displayed such vulnerability in the moments before the guitars kicked in. I was already a committed fan.
The next day I spent all my eMusic credits for the month on his existing discography. (side note: Did you know that eMusic still exists?)
All that is to say that the next day was my first experience with A Sun Came. My initial reaction was that, compared to Michigan and Seven Swans, A Sun Came was an impressive first album that showed a promise that was realized in his later albums. The several listens I’ve had of this album over the last few days convinced me that this album is a gem in its own right. This record is quite good, even if it weren’t a precursor for better sounds to come.
It’s been awhile since I’ve heard the full Sufjan Stevens catalog, but this may be his most influenced recording. Nearly every song has touches of Celtic, Indian, Middle Eastern, and American folk tunes. Occasionally–like in “A Loverless Bed (Without Remission)”–the cacophonous musical origins work together to make a uniquely interesting and good track. More often than not, though, the songs seem to reach a bit too far. Still, the old Robert Browning chestnut holds true because this album’s overreaching turned into incredible tunes in his subsequent recordings.
Lastly, let’s talk about the recording method and the strange interludes dropped throughout the album. The production value is relatively low on A Sun Came and it was reportedly recorded on a four track machine a few years before its official release while Sufjan was a member of a band called Marzuki. It’s certainly not garage band lo-fi sounding, but the lower quality recording technique forces the listener to forgive a few songs for their imperfection. And those interludes! “Belly Button,” “Siamese Twins,” and “Godzuki” have me imagining that Sufjan was listening to a lot of Wu-Tang Clan while mastering this album and making the track order. Could you imagine Sufjan Stevens providing an example in the torture introduction of “M.E.T.H.O.D Man” from 36 Chambers? (note: I doubt that there is any more NSFW audio available than the previous link so protect your little ears.)
If anything could be more awkward than live-Sufjan speaking between songs, a guest Wu-Tang verse would be it.
This has always been my favorite song from this album and its place remains. It’s the simplest song on this record and is the most Seven Swans like of the all. Sufjan’s simple vocal mannerisms shine here and the subtle vocal harmonies are to die for.
“Loverless Bed (Without Remission)”
The trem/reverb guitar intro is enough to send me over the moon. As mentioned above, it’s a heavily influenced song that works better than most on this record.
Just listen to it. It’s unique and incredible. More chanting!
Check back next week for my take on Enjoy Your Rabbit. I’ve spent the least time with this recording so I’m mostly hesitant about it. Wish me luck.
Posted: February 2nd, 2015 | Author: Ian | Filed under: Culture, Music | Tags: Sufjan Stevens | No Comments »
A few weeks ago our beloved national troubadour Sufjan Stevens announced a new album titled Carrie & Lowell set to be released on March 31st. This will be his first solo album in five years and my anticipation is quite high.
If the official album trailer is any indication, this album will lean more toward folk than electronic music and, for me, that’s a good thing.
There are shades of electronic touches in the trailer so I don’t suspect that this will be a Seven Swans redux, but perhaps something more akin to Illinois than to The Age of Adz. Regardless, I’m excited.
With that excitement comes a fresh commitment to writing about music. The plan is to take an as-objective-as-possible look at each of Sufjan’s previous album releases and record my take here. My love for the music of Sufjan Stevens is well documented and ever present so I have no dreams of journalistic disinterestedness, but I’ll do my best. Here’s how the plan will shake out:
Feb 3: A Sun Came
Feb 10: Enjoy Your Rabbit
Feb 17: Michigan
Feb 24: Seven Swans
March 3: Illinois
March 10: The Avalanche / The BQE / All Delighted People
March 17: The Age of Adz
March 24: Songs for Christmas / Silver & Gold / Chopped & Scrooged
March 31: Carrie & Lowell
Check back tomorrow for my look into his first record.
Posted: February 1st, 2015 | Author: Ian | Filed under: Culture, food, Vegan | Tags: dessert, food, vegan, whole 30 | No Comments »
Today marks the first day after Whole 30 and we both made it through the whole 30 days. Nearly a month without sugar, grains (kind of), beans, alcohol, or much whining.
Truth be told, it wasn’t all that bad for either of us. Because I don’t eat meat I had to make a few concessions that aren’t right in line with the Whole 30 mentality but which fall within the guidelines for vegetarians (tofu and tempeh primarily), but Jenna was steadfast with the program and did a magnificent job with it. Neither of us had outrageous cravings and I feel confident saying that we both mostly enjoyed the challenges of Whole 30.
Overall, I don’t think we feel much different than before, but we’ve both learned quite a bit about our eating habits and have gotten the chance to rethink our relationships with food.
Here are my take-aways:
1. Sugar isn’t as important as I once thought. We both love dessert and since we haven’t had any sugar since the beginning of January, we’ve learned that it’s possible to finish a meal and not top it off with ice cream or cookies.
2. Fruit is a delicious treat.
3. I really love grains (especially rice) and beans.
4. Advanced meal prep makes life quite a bit better.
5. Roasted veggies are my jam.
6. Dairy is not necessary.
Number six, for me, is the most important.
For the past two years I have been vegetarian and the two years before that I was vegan. Starting today (post-Whole 30), I’m back to vegan. There are a number of factors in this decision but it really comes down to personal ethics. If my ethical beliefs on food will not allow me to consume meat, then it follows that I cannot make the choice to consume animal products in general. The egg/dairy industry feeds directly into meat industries and I cannot buy into that in good conscience.
Please don’t read any judgment in the paragraph above. If nothing else, Whole 30 has revealed that food is an intensely personal matter and it’s fraught with emotion, tradition, and preference. A vegan diet is right for me, but you’re free to your own choices.
All that having been said, here’s to less animal cruelty and more delicious meals.